Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan: "device RGB"



Tony writes ...

> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:43:54 -0800  shAf (michael@shaffer.net) wrote:
>

> > I'm harping about imperceivable effects of one implimentation of CM
> > versus another more rigorous ...
>
> Last time someone said that of VS, ISTR Ed took exception and pointed out
VS
> does no more and no less than ICM, except not give you a tag.

    I meant it only in the context of what you seemed to imply ... VS
offering only trismuthus matrix tranformations.  It is apparently something
quite rigorous to impliment and tranform 3-dimensional LUT-type device
profiles.  I believe Ed would have to license the Adobe or Kodak rendering
engines to offer this.

    As you noted I expect a lot for $40 ... but not really ... I only want
an understanding of Ed's implimentations, and strive for clearing up any
confusions.  For example ... to ask for AdobeRGB from VS, and then see the
image in VS's window is terribly confusing ... that is, until you understand
why.

shAf  :o)





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.