Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..



>From Epson Inkjet Mailing list Resources: http://home.att.net/~arwomack01/

A4 is 8.3" x 11.7"

A3 is 11.7" x 16.5"

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hargens" <ldmr@cruzio.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Cc: "Chris Hargens" <chargens@Eloquent.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..


| Just what size is are A4 and A3 prints? Also, I should note that I've
often
| heard/read people remark that they can print off scanned images up to such
| and such size (e.g., 11"x14"), but I'm not always clear about just what
size
| the image is that is placed on the paper. What, for example, is the usual
| image size for a print on A4 paper? Does it vary much?
|
| Chris Hargens
|
|
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Tony Sleep <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
| To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
| Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:56 AM
| Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..
|
|
| >On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:45:20 +1000  Rob Geraghty (harper@wordweb.com)
| wrote:
| >
| >> Obscanning: I have yet to try printing at A3, but do those who have
| printed
| >> at A3 from 2700dpi scans find the scanning resolution adequate?
| >
| >Back to back comparisons here between A4 1200 prints of 2700 & 4000ppi
| scans of
| >the same Astia image show a slight fudging of fine detail in the 2700
| print.
| >Viewed alone, it's fine, but once you have noticed the slightly
'vaseline'
| >effect of lower sampling res, it's hard to overlook if you are being
picky.
| >However I didn't notice until I did the comparison :)
| >
| >A3 will make this rather more noticeable, but TBH there are very few 35mm
| >images which really benefit from that sort of size unless they will be
| viewed
| >from at least 3'.
| >
| >> I was intrigued
| >> (and a little depressed) to read Tony's recent comment that the
aliasing
| >> at 4000dpi was much less than at 2700dpi.
| >
| >All I meant is that 4000ppi seems to greatly reduce the sensitivity to
film
| >grain which causes this intractable problem. It's just one less thing to
| have
| >to worry about.
| >
| >If you stick to films which don't excite grain aliasing problems (Astia,
| >Provia, KR64, Reala - none gave me any trouble with an LS1000, and I'm
sure
| >there are many others), a 2700ppi unit won't give grain aliasing. Problem
| >solved ;)
| >
| >> I'll bite the bullet in the next
| >> few days and actually try an A3 print.
| >
| >Definitely the best idea :-)
| >
| >Regards
| >
| >Tony Sleep
| >http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner
info
| &
| >comparisons
| >
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.