ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Color saturation with Vuescan



Maris

Agreed on the budget printers. Blown out highlights and no shadow detail. 

Still, even comparing my scans to good quality digital cameras like the Nikon 
990 leaves me dissapointed when viewing them on screen. My scans are sharper, 
which is not surprising given the resolution difference, but again, they just 
don't seem to have the color I guess I'm used to, or that people (clients) want 
to see.

I'm trying to determine if I've missed something, just haven't learned enough 
yet, or am expecting too much from the setup I have. It's hard to accept that 
an $500 digital camera can give better results when the output is for the web...

--
Jim



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:33:13 -0600

>I think what the low-budget photo printers must do is set the black and
>white points of the image well inside their normal settings, losing detail
>in highlights and shadows.
>
>The best I could recommend is a lot of sweat continuing to practice working
>with levels and curves in Photoshop.
>
>Maris




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.