ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



Ever since FAT32 came out, I've given up on NTFS for all but drives that
need the extra security.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of shAf
> Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 7:47 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
>
>
> Frank writes ...
>
> > Photoshop is really not a consumer-level product,
> > and truly does benefit from Windows 2000.
> > ...
>
>       According to threads at the Adobe forum, this fact is highly
> dependent on how well Win2k runs with your hardware drivers, and
> marginal at best.  Win98se is better supported in this respect.  And
> to truely get the HD speed from Win2k for matching the drivers
> available for Win98, you'd need turn off the overhead required by NTFS
> security, that is install it on FAT32 formatted drives.
>
> shAf  :o)
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.