ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: File sizes, file formats, etc. for printing 8.5 x 11and 13 x 17...



Roger,

  If your OS is Win95/98/Me/2000 I suggest you try a program called Qimage
Pro. You don't have to resample for printing as the program does it for you.
The print results are far superior than PS or PSP. The program is very
inexpensive and the support is very good.

You can get a trial version at:
http://www.charm.net/~mchaney/imaging/index.html

Dale


> 1. In my case, I always scan at the optical resolution of the
> scanner (2720 ppi with my Canon FS 2710). This gives a file of about
> 26.5 Mb (assuming you are using an 8-bit file).
> For printing I resize to the size I want in Photoshop's Image
> Size ("Resample Image" unclicked) and let the resolution fall where
> it may. There have been many discussions on the "ideal" image file
> resolution for Epson printers, but the consensus seems to be
> somewhere between 240 ppi and 360 ppi. My tests showed that there was
> some improvement in going up from 240 to 300 to 360, but that there
> was no degradation of the print using odd resolutions such as 347 ppi
> or 353.753 ppi. Some people have claimed that using odd values for
> resolution affects the quality of their prints, but I haven't found
> that to be the case.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.