ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá

äÌÑ ÷ÁÓ ÂÅÓÐÌÁÔÎÙÊ ÈÏÓÔÉÎÇ ÆÏÒÕÍÏ× ÎÁ getbb.ru











     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems



In a message dated 2/5/2001 10:51:27 AM EST, michael@shaffer.net writes:

> The only question which remains is if the service's JPEG compression
>  also smoothed the data before compression.

The way to test this is to start with a tiff file from a well-focused
scanner (assuming a 24-bit tiff file is what the scanning service
offers).  Then, take this 24-bit tiff file and produce a jpeg file
at approximately 7:1 compression.  The comparison is then
between the original tiff file and the jpeg file.

Taking a jpeg file and producing a tiff file from it isn't useful.

Regards,
Ed Hamrick




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.