ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: real value?



I use my D30 on Super-Fine JPEG mostly, and the 1G Microdrive can hold 
about 799 of those.

In article <VA.00001126.01faef11@virgin.net>, brian.rumary@virgin.net 
(B.Rumary) wrote:

> In <B69BA4BD.1693%yvesberia@earthlink.net>, Berry Ives wrote:
> 
> > Digital SLRs that have maybe half the required resolution now cost 
> > about
> > $3K.
> > 
> > If that technology progresses at anything like what CPUs have, I 
> > think 10
> > years is rather ample to eliminate, say, 90% of the 35mm film market. 
> >  That
> > said, I recently bought a Contax film camera and am about to buy a 
> > film
> > scanner.  (%~~/>   ~~~~~~~~........
> >
> I think we are tending to judge the market by our own standards. I am 
> not interested in a digital camera *at the moment* because the 
> resolution is not up to my standards for the price that I can afford. 
> However for the ordinary member of the public they are already "good 
> enough". Remember most people's standards for photos are pretty low, as 
> you can see be looking at most "happy snaps" (or home videos). All they 
> want is reasonable pictures that are recognizable, and they hardly ever 
> have a print made bigger then the 6x4's they get when they have the 
> film processed. They don't have 10x12's made and then look at them 
> through a lens to see how fine the grain is! And they _never_ use 
> slides or black & white; too inconvenient or old fashioned.
> 
> I also feel that the memory chips, flash cards or what ever don't hold 
> enough high quality shots for the price. When I go on an overseas trip 
> I shoot 10-12 35mm films, and this would need several flash cards or 
> memory sticks, at a heavy cost. Many photographers take several times 
> this number of frames. However the ordinary public don't take that many 
> shots. There is a joke in the photo processing business that the 
> average punters film has a Christmas tree in the first frame and also 
> in the last one - that is one film lasts them all year!
> 
> What has this to so with us? Well such people make up 95% of the 
> photographic market, and their needs (or what the advertisers tell them 
> they need) will drive the industry. Before too long you might find that 
> you can't get non-digital supplies, because "there is no demand for 
> them". You might still be able to get such stuff as film and photo 
> paper from professional suppliers, at "professional prices", but the 
> photography stores we use now may have gone out of business. If you 
> don't believe me, try to get old-style flash bulbs, glass plates, or 
> films other than APS, 35mm and 120.
> 
> I hope that it doesn't come to this, but I am rather afraid that we may 
> have to go digital eventually, whether we like it or not.
> 
> Brian Rumary, England
> 
> http://freespace.virgin.net/brian.rumary/homepage.htm
> 
> 
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.