ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?



Actually it was purely electronic and mechanical.  I typed "current" in but
the computer only registered the first two and the last two characters.
When I sent the email the spell checker did not catch the word; Microsoft
obviously views it as a legitimate old Anglo-Saxon word. :-)  What is
unusual about this post is that the spell checker did not catch the problem.
The system that I use for my email tends to drop characters a lot for one
reason or another; but typically the errors are caught by the spell checker
before transmission.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 3:35 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?




Laurie Solomon wrote:

> I never intended to write anything of the sort.  The computer skipped some
> characters in transmitting the message.  It should have read: "you are
still
> more or less current and can afford...."  Sorry about that.

Was that Freudian web-slip?

Art




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.