ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scratched Negs & Home C-41 processing



I've been doing the same thing recently.  I've noticed fewer scratches, but
about the same amount of dust.  

What I really like is the money savings from not having prints made.  This
is particularly true when I shoot APS (I prefer medium format, but I can't
carry my Kiev 88 in my jacket pocket! (without looking like a dork  ;-) )).


Using viewscan, I can scan the entire APS roll unattended with my Scan Multi
II and get a "contact sheet" from which I can decide which images should be
scanned and printed.

Love that viewscan!!!

Guy Clark

-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Richardson [mailto:itai46@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 6:28 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Scratched Negs & Home C-41 processing


In the last few months I've been having my C41 film processed, cut and 
sleeved without getting prints made.  Since I started doing this I have 
found a significant reduction in the number of scratches on my negatives.  
It seems that many of the scratches may be introduced while printing.  When 
I get them home I plop the plastic page with the negatives on my lightbox 
and decide which to scan.  By the way, without prints it only costs me $1.99

a roll to get my film processed.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.