Lexa Software: Nginx-ru@sysoev.ru archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

АРХИВ :: nginx-ru

Nginx-ru mailing list archive (nginx-ru@sysoev.ru)

To: nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: прокси или dnat?
From: "Kirill A. Korinskiy" <catap@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 00:40:12 +0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=vEGP9SCYt+5KzL5gFphDsRbNZMYwuaUvzVXAB08A1Ec=; b=Nvo7CpB9GCavWP6Lpr6m05VFfPogXoA6Hvtzl5hxPGuNJk/nK6PskofdUsOFXb6JGj GvcL1REbw8GR8o4V1bzufelPmPXHrdPzmHOWE2RFtvctjPIzJNJDJb8QFjNEPbZ+1hgM kA9hrLNJmYrRT8XhiIJeP9RpoQ3n+8nzZhPfI=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=JMgjT1ajDC7XPeywojUH0j6BEMHv3A5UO5DIQ21FoOnKchIUPZYBfEKTkaWqKgqKS0 7ioW+k+zR8/dAxXPJpMUv7st12R/f+nZkKB/FFM7Y8UD7SoAti242nnOQ6keh0xEnBbS T6kXA66eOvmpLKJzL7NsUhdC9CybpZLAaZE/M=
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimpHUSKixA=As81Tw0kqZJsFBvdT_CwvRXrrLt2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <AANLkTi=oRC0N2JX05JjaG84NOvmDmdfHtfiHXeR2FLtr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimpHUSKixA=As81Tw0kqZJsFBvdT_CwvRXrrLt2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Любым фронтэндом. nat всегда будет больше ресурсов кушать.

Слушай, в случае проксирования как минимум будут копирования ks->us и обратно us->ks, в случае dnat можно сделать все в рамках ядра.

Можешь раскрыть мысль?

wbr, Kirill

_______________________________________________
nginx-ru mailing list
nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx
http://nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-ru

References:
- прокси или dnat?
  - From: Denis Kot
- Re: прокси или dnat?
  - From: xpahos@xxxxxxxxx