Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Kodak's alternative to Bayer sensor pattern
Is this server working or not? It seems to come and go like an English
summer.
George Harrison
-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Paul D. DeRocco
Sent: 15 June 2007 17:11
To: gh50@btinternet.com
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Kodak's alternative to Bayer sensor pattern
> From: Michael Kersenbrock
>
> Makes sense I guess. NTSC TV was designed with the data
> bandwidth for the luminance a great deal higher than the
> chromiance that I recall, and done because that's what made
> sense for the eye as they split available bandwidth. This
> sounds like the same idea.
Not horribly noticeable, but noticeable. Lots of point-and-shoot cameras
blur the crap out of the color, to reduce color noise. The resulting
artifacts don't scream at you, but the images do look a bit odd.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
