ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CS 5000 ED vs. Minolta ???



Laurie Solomon wrote:

>So Mike what you are saying is that unless the Nikon has a manual focus like
>the Minolta does the problem is not correctable with the Nikon scanner but
>is correctable with the Minolta; but both scanners have the problem under
>the autofocus option.
>
>
No, I don't think I said that.  I only talked about one or two aspects
of Minolta's problem
with the default autofocus (using their software).   After all, that's
half of the subject
and the half I know at least a little about (having one).  As to it
applying to the Nikon
scanner, I leave others with the Nikon to provide the comparison after
my  mentioning
details in the 5400 and how I get around it.   I'm not attacking the Nikon
as you suggest, I don't have one and don't know enough to say anything
about it.

In any case, although I have used the manual focus knob, I've found it
also useful to
use "autofocus", however I set the focus point on the slide to a more
appropriate
point rather than the default dead-center.

Mike K.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.