ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: negative conversion



From: <derek_c@cix.co.uk>
> When you make a straight optical print, can you just expose the print
> with default enlarger settings and make a perfect print, or do you have
> to spend some time working out the right filter pack?
>
> Given that the latter is the answer, why do you feel a digital print
> should involve less effort?
>
> Can you give more detail of why you are having problems with scanning
> negatives?
Yes, I can.
With enlarger you correct the whole picture by the same amount. The
proportion od colors is always the same, provided you use the same film
type. With digital you can have the whole picture well corrected but one
particular color will be off and this particular color will be oversaturated
in VueScan and undesaturated in NikonScan. VueScan gives really good results
but highlights always have a blueish tint. I'll try to post some samples on
my site later today or tomorrow, I have to pay for my expired pbase account.

Regards

Tomek
www.zakrzewski.art.pl

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.