ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CMS and color space on Nikon 4000ED



Yeah, a whiel ago I was also wondering people recommedning swithcing
off
Nikon CMS and lamenting about poor defualt Nikon's profiles. I was
never suffered from this with my LS-40. Scans come out in good colors,
contrast, I was nothing to complain about (I use NikonScan 3.1.2). I
never apply NikonScan image editing (aside of ICE of course and at a
times GEM if I'll have not time for NeatImage processing), all the rest
comes as TIFFs into PS7 and done there if necessary.
Once begining my scanning experience I set scanner's output format as
Adobe 98 RGB, do all the necessary editing in PS7, and save for an
archive as Adobe 98 RGB either. Only the files intended for web and
just a showcase is converted to a common sRGB and them JPEG compressed.

This is my approach.

Alex

--- Ed Verkaik <verkaik@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I could really use some help deciding on the preferred way of working
> with this scanner.
>
> I do most of my adjustments in Nikonscan on PC, with CMS on and
> output
> to "Nikon Adobe 1998".  I use no custom profiles and am not worried
> about color management, generally... scans look good and noone has
> complained.
>
> After checking around, I see most people turn CMS off.  Why?- is it a
> quality issue?  If there are advantages to doing this, I would need
> to
> select "Scanner RGB" to allow me to use the Nikonscan tools. Who uses
> this space, and are there any issues with doing so?
>
> When the TIFFs come into PS7, I do a few more adjustments and work in
> the Adobe 1998 RGB space.  If these files are destined for agencies
> or
> clients, is there any problem leaving the profile as "Nikon Adobe
> 1998"?  If I decide to use "Scanner RGB" instead, then what do you
> recommend for the Assign- and Convert to- profile options?
>
> Since I will soon be converting my 16bit files to 8bit, I wondered
> which
> of the above choices in PS provide a better archive?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ed Verkaik
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.