ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Pixels and Prints



Laurie,

I thought I had read somewhere that if you send images to the Epson driver
with dpi that are larger than its native dpi (360/720) it simply discards
rows of pixels as scanners often do, rather than downsample them by any
interpolation method.

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message -----
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <laurie@advancenet.net>

I do concur with your conclusion; and in practice, do what you suggest. From
a theoretical point of view, I was just curious about the answer to the
question given that so many in the discussion were arguing that if one sent
the printer a file with less than its native resolution the printer would
perform an interpolation using nearest neighbor techniques which would lower
the quality of the output but did not mention the effect of the oposite case
where one sent a file that had a resoution higher than the printer's native
resolution.  Thus, leaving open the question as to which theoretically would
be the best option to take if one were to have a choice - e.g., letting the
printer upsample to its native resolution or downsample to its native
resolution.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.