ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Re:A scanner question




Preston,

> The world can be divided into three groups: (1) People who believe
> 16-bit data is better than 8-bit data in color photographic scans. (2)
> People who know it isn't and try to educate the folks in Group 1. (3)
> People who know it isn't and have given up on the folks in Group 1. I
> vacillate between Groups 2 and 3.

As long as you are aware that this is NOT true for B&W...and I could show
you color images that your claim above isn't true for as well, but for %99
of color images I'd agree that using 8 bit data is fine.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.