ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] File sizes (was RE: Bad News on CD longevity)



On Wednesday, August 27, 2003, at 08:59 PM, Nagaraj, Ramesh wrote:

> Once more people migrate to DSLRs thirst of memory may reduce beacuse,
> depending on the resolution of DSLR, size of image is going to be
> around 6-15MB.
>
> Thanks
> Ramesh

Ramesh,

Unless you know something I don't I believe you to be wrong about this.

I am shooting  this month with a Canon EOS 1Ds; the opened RAW file
size is around 31.5Mb in 8-bit and 63Mb in 16-bit modes. My two year
old Nikon D1x produces Tiff files camera file sizes of about 17.5 Mb. I
haven't really looked at the opened size of the 10Mp NEF files possible
with Nikon Capture 3.5.

Leaf Valeo just introduced a 22Mp back for medium format cameras.

File sizes are going up not down, as resolution gets higher.
And that is before you start adding correction layers in Photoshop and
then archiving the work with seperate layers intact. (Doing this makes
it easier to go back and either modify what you did to target the iamge
for a new output device or method without having to start from scratch
or to eliminate a specific correction completely.)

Best Regards,

Ellis Vener
Atlanta, GA
http://www.ellisvener.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.