ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: keeping the 16bit scans



> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of LAURIE SOLOMON
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 9:12 AM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: keeping the 16bit scans
>
>
> These days I suspect that all the brands are more or less the
> same in terms of fail rates and ech goes through periods when
> they have a model or production run that has problems.  I
> just noticed that with the increase in size and speed there
> seems to have been a proportional increase in the probability
> that an EIDE drive will fail within  1 1/2 years of its
> purchase.

What is that probability? If it is from 10% to 15%, who cares? I'm sure
most drives last a lot longer than 1.5 years.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.