Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-4000ED Depth of Field Revisited
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-4000ED Depth of Field Revisited
- From: "" <robg@wordweb.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:29:24 +1000
- In-reply-to: <3E5551490035AE81@mta2.wss.scd.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com)
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
golder@netzero.com wrote:
>Didn't find much difference btwn the auto strip feeder and the manual strip
>holder when it came to total focus plane variation on the same piece of
film.
> They were quite close, but the autostrip feeder actually proved a little
>bit better at a delta of 16 nikon units vs. 21 nikon units for the manual
>holder.
Is the auto strip feeder in the LS4000 significantly different in design
to the LS30/2000? I stopped using it when I found out that strips tended
to curl in the machine, and the frames at the end of a neg strip ended up
horribly out of focus on one side. It worked ok on frames in the middle
of a strip.
Rob
-------------
How do you know if you never try?
(Rob Geraghty 25 June 2002)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
