Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-4000ED Depth of Field Revisited


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-4000ED Depth of Field Revisited
  • From: "" <robg@wordweb.com>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:29:24 +1000
  • In-reply-to: <3E5551490035AE81@mta2.wss.scd.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com)
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

golder@netzero.com wrote:
>Didn't find much difference btwn the auto strip feeder and the manual strip
>holder when it came to total focus plane variation on the same piece of
film.
> They were quite close, but the autostrip feeder actually proved a little
>bit better at a delta of 16 nikon units vs. 21 nikon units for the manual
>holder.

Is the auto strip feeder in the LS4000 significantly different in design
to the LS30/2000?  I stopped using it when I found out that strips tended
to curl in the machine, and the frames at the end of a neg strip ended up
horribly out of focus on one side.  It worked ok on frames in the middle
of a strip.

Rob

-------------
How do you know if you never try?
(Rob Geraghty 25 June 2002)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.