Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: JPEG2000 > Paul
>-----Original Message-----
>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>I just tried the fnord one, and it's waaay slower than the LuraWave, by a
>factor of three for both encoding and decoding. If you found the LuraWave
>one slow, it must be because it was an early version.
Indeed, as I said in my previous email it's about 1/2 years that I have
tested the LuraWave codec. They have merged with Algo Vision a while back.
Last week they have bombarded me with advertising about their latest
products. So it's quite likely they have improved their codec quite a bit.
Nevertheless, I doubt that they are significantly faster then kakadu for
bitdepths lower then 12 bits. For a higher bit-depth kakadu can be improved
easily. Anyways, I am not sure if fnord is using kakadu. And if it is the
creator might have messed up. Maybe I should add that the person who
developed fnord just came out with this plug-in. It's quite likely there
will be improvements in the future.
Robert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
