ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CO2



Sorry Art, my mess crossed yours - two souls, same funny taste!

Preben

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>
To: <krille@tin.it>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: CO2


Personally, I prefer Nitrous Oxide (just say NO?), it may not clean your
  film, but it sure seems to make the dust seem funny....

;-)

Art


Jerry M. Pine wrote:

> Is there any reason that using CO2 is superior to using compressed
Nitrogen
> cylinders?
>
> Nitrogen is an inert substance and is a major component of air (about
80%).
>
> ---
> Jerry M. Pine
> San Jose, CA
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.