ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: shoot first, fix it later



Are most of the photos on Architectural Digest taken with
 at least 4 x5?

Or are 645 & 6x6 with wide angle lens
say 40mm not good for architectural shooting (interior &
out)? the 55mm PC shift lens may be good for perspective
control but I think it's not wide enough for the applicat
ion, and too much $$$.

Aside from the equipment, quali
ty 4x5 filmscanners really costs. Sorry for somewhat off-
topic and off-line if you like, thanks.

JMS

> Remem
ber, my original example was quarter-page usage. If it wa
s
> full-page-in-Architectural-Digest usage then I'd fir
mly be on the side of 4 x 5, not even 6
> x 6 + shift le
ns would likely be good enough.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.