ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: No more Kodak CD-R's



Julian writes:

> If the bad bit is in an in an executable, it
> can certainly wreak a lot of havoc.

Photographs are not executables.

> Been there, seen that.

I don't recall having ever encountered it, but it has only been a few
decades, so it is statistically unlikely.

> We take it for granted that our computer data
> will be written perfectly, but it is quite
> remarkable when we think about how many bits
> are shuffled around when in file copies, installs,
> backups, restores, etc.

Yes.  It still is written perfectly, though.

It isn't really that amazing when you compare it to, say, DNA replication.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.