ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Compression




> Have a look at
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/1ds/1ds-field.shtml
>
> I have some minor reservations about his comparison with film...

I always have reservations about much of anything on that web site.  He
states that the scans were done on a Flextite at 3200, then claims that's as
good as it gets.  That's not true.  There are many scanners with higher
resolution.  A lot of this has to do with scanner operation as well.  It's
interesting the comparisons aren't done with drum scans.

I believe he is completely biased in his assessments, and I really don't
know what the basis for his severe bias is, but I can only guess...  Perhaps
someone is holding a Canon to his head ;-)

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.