ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Color Misregistration (Especially Polaroid Sprintscan 120)




"Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
Multisampling buys very little, as the Nikon already sees pretty well into
the shadows.  I usually leave it set at 4x.
<<<<<<<<<<

Yes. I see no difference between 1x and 16x (I've only tested it with one
dark Provia slide, though), and leave it at 1x.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The worst issue with the 8000 is banding, which is sometimes visible in very
dark areas adjacent to very light areas.  You can eliminate it by switching
to a "superfine" scan, which uses only one CCD line instead of all three,
but the scan takes three times as long.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Actually, it only takes slightly longer: 4:30 vs. 3:40 for 645. Here are the
times I get:

Acquire thumbnails: 20 seconds
Acquire preview: 35 seconds
Minimal 4000dpi 645 scan: 1 min 30 seconds. (No ICE, 1x, not fine mode, 8
bits.)
ICE scan: 3:40
4x scan: 3:55
16x, 14-bit scan: 13:50
Super fine scan: 3:25
ICE, super-fine, 1x scan: 4:30
14-bit scan: 1:30

David J. Littleboy
davidjl@gol.com
Tokyo, Japan



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.