You are certainly right, Paul. Good catch. If Margulis is such an expert,
how could he let that one slip by?
On 8/18/02 2:48 AM, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I took a close look at those two horse images in the PDF file on page 280,
> by magnifying the PDF as much as possible, so that the individual pixels
> were easily visible as squares. What I found was that the image that he said
> had been scanned at a higher resolution was actually rendered in the
> document with exactly half the resolution. I don't know what's going on
> here, but that's not a fair comparison.
>
> --
>
> Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
>
>> From: Julian Vrieslander
>>
>> It's from Dan Margulis' book "Professional Photoshop". A couple of the
>> chapters are available on the web. Earlier in this thread, Preston Earle
>> posted a link to one of them:
>>
>> <>
>
--
Julian Vrieslander <julianv@mindspring.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
