ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Web home page writing software



> From: Anthony Atkielski
>
> Both [Frontpage and Dreamweaver] generate garbage that passes for
> HTML.  It is almost impossible to pick
> apart if you ever want to modify it yourself, and I think they
> designed the software to make it that way deliberately.

As long as it produces the correct results in a web browser, who cares?

> I've seen pages that contained 50 KB of HTML alone generated by
> Dreamweaver,
> which I was able to reduce to about 3 KB with identical functionality by
> tossing Dreamweaver and writing the HTML directly.

I've seen C++ compilers generate hundred-kilobyte programs that I could
write in a hundred bytes using assembly language. Given that 100K of RAM
costs two cents, and 100K of disk space costs a hundredth of a cent, I'll
write in C++. And given that a 50KB page can load in 8 seconds via dialup
and a fraction of a second via broadband, I'll save the much longer
programming time and use Dreamweaver.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.