[filmscanners] Re: Macintosh Image Archiving/Indexing Software

["David Townend" <d.townend@ntlworld.com>]

Hi Brad,
I'm using iView. On the speed test you conducted on iView if you didn't have
"ignore built in thumbnails" ticked (Edit>Import Options>On Import>Ignore
built in thumbnails - ticked) iView will indeed use thumbnails existing in
the files you are importing, rather than build its own (which are far
superior). But this takes more time.
Regards, David
--
You can view David's on-line folio at http://www.davidtownend.com/
and also the results of a recent job at http://www.globalrisks.royalsun.com

T - 00 44 (0)20 8374 6289
M - 00 44 (0)7770 622144

> From: "Brad Smith" <bms0345@pacbell.net>
> Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:49:55 -0700
> To: d.townend@ntlworld.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Macintosh Image Archiving/Indexing Software
>
> I'm GUESSING that the 4 and 6 second results for adding the 10 large images
> somehow grabbed existing thumbnails while the approx 40 second ones "built"
> their own.  So I don't know that the test is meaningful.  Opinions??

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body