ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning negs vs. slides



> > ...
> > ... the dye densities are higher with slides, but
> > the noise is also higher in a slide (less discernability
> > between tones), ...
>
>   ... "noise" reference please!  That is, there is plenty of room for
> "discernability between tones" for slides.  Noise would hide this, of
> course, but I don't believe slides are any noisier than negs, nor is
> scanning slides any more susceptable to noise.  What kind of
> "noise" are you
> talking about?

Hi Michael,

You're right scanning has nothing to do with this, of course.  It's in the
film response as well as development.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.