ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon LS8000 vs. MinoltaScanMulti Pro!



>> I'm also wondering if LS-8000 scans with no dICE (for B&W scans
particularly) are more problematic than with CCD scanners using a
conventional light source?  Comments from users regarding Kodachrome and B&W
scanning would be appreciated!<<

I'm scanned some, not a lot, of Kodachrome with the 8000. No problems to
report, and the scans are great using NikonScan.

I scan quite a bit of B&W, mostly 120 Verichrome or FP4 negs processed in
PMK or Xtol. Sometimes I use Nikonscan, sometimes VueScan. About 25% of the
time I'll use the glass carrier. I'm quite happy with the results.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.