ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: X rays was Digital PIC



I hope we are not going to have this same drawn out discussion about
using local processors versus using the processors available when we
travel, again.  If so, how about I save you the time and just upload the
whole d*mn argument from last time. (actually I don't have it archived,
but I'm sure someone does...)

Just in case anyone missed it last time, Anthony likes buying film and
having it processed where he goes rather than bringing film with him or
bring unprocessed film back.  OK?

Art

Anthony Atkielski wrote:

 > Jack writes:
 >
 >
 >>Someone mentioned buying film locally and
 >>processing it locally. I have a hard time
 >>finding my favorite film types anyway. I
 >>try to buy in bulk and test the batch before
 >>a critical shoot.
 >>
 >
 > What good does testing a batch do if you allow it all to be randomly
exposed
 > to radiation?
 >
 >
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
 > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
title or body
 >
 >



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.