Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Re:Digital PIC




----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <krille@tin.it>
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 6:59 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Re:Digital PIC



> With all due respect, you are wrong for once...

Once?  You haven't been around long, eh? ;-)

> The newest LF digital backs are 12000 x 15990 pixels producing a file of
> 1.1GB in 48bit. It is the Better Light Super 8K-2 digital back.
> Its smaller
> sibling, the Super 6K-2 produces 9000 x 12000 pixels. Furthermore, they go
> from ISO 200-3200 in 1/10th of f-stop increments. Quite impressive!
>
> Phase One has the PowerPhase FX which gives you 10500 x 12.600 pixels,
> albeit only in 24bit - a file of 380mb.

Aren't those scanning backs?  If so, sorry, Anthony was right, as he said
"ONE-SHOT" backs...

Austin

------------------------

Austin,

Antony unilaterally changed the parameters for the discussion to one shot
backs - probably unintentionally....

However, here is my original posting for your info, and, as far as I can
see, there's no mention or qualification in it refering to either scanning
backs, one shot backs or even three shot backs.

> The medium/big format professional digital
> camera backs are now approaching or even
> surpassing 35mm film quality.

----------------------------------------------
To which Anthony replied:

>None of the LF or MF one-shot backs comes anywhere close to film quality.
>The latest PhaseOne H20 back for MF yields 4080x4080 pixels, or less than
>one-fourth of a medium-resolution scan of film in the same format.

----------------------------------------------------------------
To which I replied:

> With all due respect, you are wrong for once...

> The newest LF digital backs are 12000 x 15990 pixels producing a file of
> 1.1GB in 48bit. It is the Better Light Super 8K-2 digital back.
> Its smaller sibling, the Super 6K-2 produces 9000 x 12000 pixels.
Furthermore, they go
> from ISO 200-3200 in 1/10th of f-stop increments. Quite impressive!

> Phase One has the PowerPhase FX which gives you 10500 x 12.600 pixels,
> albeit only in 24bit - a file of 380mb.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------

I suggest we leave the dead horse, hide the whip and get on with less OT
matters..... :-)

Happy Easter Monday

Preben

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.