ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Re:Digital PIC



Well, if digital cameras fulfilled all the criteria, then film would
have been gone a long time ago.  Obviously, it still doesn't.

I haven't yet found a media card that stores the equivalent of 7400
megabytes (36-38 exposures at about 200 megs each), costs under $5, and
fits into a canister that weighs about 2 ounces, and requires no energy
source to maintain the latent image for years, have you?

Art

Preben S. Kristensen wrote:

>>I'm still waiting for the reusable film that can be recharged after >the
>>
> images are taken off of it.
>
> Art, do you mean almost like a digital camera? :-)
>
> Preben
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.