Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
- From: "david soderman" <scapes@wi.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:39:56 -0600
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Al Bond wrote:
> Like Art I am a fan of ICE but it does definitely soften the image. For
> instance, I scanned a slide recently (using an Elite II) where the teeth of a
> zip on a jacket were quite clearly defined when ICE was switched off. As
> soon as ICE was turned on, the teeth became blurred. Maybe this is due to
> the way Minolta has implemented ICE and that other scanners with ICE
> might be different.
Yes, I have found the above to be true. While I was testing a Nikon 8000ED,
I was totally blown away by how superb ICE worked with that scanner! I
currently have the Minolta Scan Multi Pro on which ICE does a much poorer
job!
Joyfully, -david soderman- <><
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
