ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000




>I know you love your Polaroid scanner. It is a great scanner. But, it
>will
>be a better scanner with Digital ICE.

I don't agree with that.  "Digital Ice" is needed more so on a scanner that
uses a point light source, and is not near as needed on a scanner with a
diffuse light source, and the Polaroid uses a diffuse light source.  Nikon
HAD to add it to even be competitive, because of their choice to use a point
light source.  Point light sources exacerbate scratches.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.