ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000



All or nothing deal.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tris Schuler" <tristanjohn@mindspring.com>
To: <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:06 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000



>I use it on an LS2000 & it saves me 3-5 hours a week. That's worth
>real money! There is very slight image degradation but far less than
>in the transition from pixels to ink.
>
>David Hoffman

Is there a control to it, to where it can directed to work on just a given
part of the image, or be directed to look for certain kinds of artifacts?
Is it an all-or-nothing deal?

Tris

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.