ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: digital ICE ?


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: digital ICE ?
  • From: "Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:05:02 -0600
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

I recommend you download the newest version of Nikon Scan. Some of the
correction algorithms have been changed slightly. I use NT 4.0 on this
workstation where I have an LS 2000 and I am forced to use NS 2.5. It seems
to work well for me but I haven't done a direct comparsion though.

Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction


-----Original Message-----
From: Op's [mailto:martin@wollongong.apana.org.au]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:44 AM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: digital ICE ?



Is there any difference between the dICE or performance  - supplied with the
early Nikon
Scan say 2.1  and the later NS 3.1.2 -  when using a Nikon LS2000  scanner?

Has it changed?  Improved or stayed the same?

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.