Interesting review for printing from digital cameras. Too bad they only
used lower resolution images than the ones common on this list. There's a
lot of resampling, sharpening, interpolation, etc. going on in the print
drivers when the best source is a 2000x3000 that was already interpolated
in camera. (not that I'd turn down a D1x if one dropped in my lap ;-) )The
review also was a bit too reliant on the "select & go" options for the
printers instead of manual tweaking. I'm suspicious of speed tests on a PC
so starved for RAM: Win98, 1.4 Ghz P4 but only 128 MB RAM. Someone really
should've caught that.
BobG
(1280 owner)
At 02:43 AM 2/27/2002, you wrote:
>I just read this review which says the Canon S9000 images look better than
>the Epson 1280.
>Any one here have any personal experience with the Canon? How good is the
>Color profile?
>
>
>
>
>Bob Kehl
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
