ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
  • From: "Jerry M. Pine" <jmpine@pacbell.net>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 09:56:21 -0800
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Didier,

I usually shoot both Portra NC 160 and VC 160, and have great results with
wet darkroom printing.

Does Portra VC 160 also scan well?

---
Jerry M. Pine
San Jose, CA

Photographs are made, not taken.


----- Original Message -----
From: "DRP" <Didier.Roubinet@wanadoo.fr>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?


I personnally prefer Portra NC, which I find more subtile, (and less
"universal"), but that's matter of personal taste.

Best regards.

Didier (Paris)



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.