Hi Tris,
I've been using Supra 100 and 400 for scanning with my Nikon 4000ED, which
seems to particularly sensitive to grain/grain aliasing. I've found the
grain to be more than I desire. Some members of this list have recommended
slightly overexposing negative film by 1/3 to 1/2 stop. Other members have
also recommended Superia, especially Reala 100 speed film. I have just
ordered some Reala and Provia100F. I hope for some improvement.
What scanner are you using. This may have some effect on the film you
select as the best option for low grain/grain aliasing.
Bob Kehl
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tris Schuler" <tristanjohn@mindspring.com>
To: <bobkehl@kvernkehl.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 7:44 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Supra for scanning?
>Hello!
>
>On their site, and in their literature, Kodak extols the virtues of
>Supra for scanning. Does anyone have experience with this film? I like
>Fuji Superia a lot, but I do get some grain aliasing problems with the
>400 ISO, and VueScan doesn't have a profile for it <g>!
>
>I will shoot a few rolls of Supra this week, but it helps to have
>others' comparisons with emulsions I may not have seen yet.
>
>And then there is always Provia, which I love, but I want to use negs on
>my next trip.
>
>Les
I kind of like the look of Supra. Here's my most recent experience with
this emulsion, a medium-difficult night scene to catch with regard to
latitude.
Hope that helps.
Tris
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
