ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Where can I actually *buy* an Nikon 8000ED?



On 2/22/02 10:49 AM, "Moreno Polloni" <mp@dccnet.com> wrote:

> You sure have a lot of opinions, but it doesn't sound like you've used any
> of the scanners you mention. You also go on to recommend the worst scanner
> of the bunch. Go figure.

Moreno,

I have used the SS120 and the 8000 extensively and my experience does not
reflect yours.  I had fewer issues with The SS120 than the 8000.  Using
Silverfast and IT8 calibration, the SS120 provided much more accurate color
rendition, sharp scans and no banding.  I did not like the film holders as
well but nothing is perfect.  Also the one that I had quit (powered down)
several times in the middle of scanning.  I really liked the ICE with the
Nikon and at the time the nikon people ASSURED me that the banding problem
was due to a fault in my particular unit so I sent the SS120 back and got
another 8000.  You know the rest of the story.  So your 'worst' scanner may
not be someone else's.

Lawrence


----------------------------------
Lawrence W. Smith Photography
http://www.lwsphoto.com
lsmith@lwsphoto.com
----------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.