ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Where can I actually *buy* an Nikon 8000ED?



On 2/21/02 10:22 AM, "doogle@doogle.com" <doogle@doogle.com> wrote:

>> Banding:
>> See http://www.lwsphoto.com/banding.htm
> 
> Wow. Very noticeable. This was consistent, eh?


With certain images it was very consistent.  It could be eliminated be using
a kludge fix (fine mode scanning) that Nikon added but I found it to be
unacceptable for the $ paid.


> 
>> Soft focus at edges: don¹t have an example posted but might get around to
>> it.
> 
> 35mm, 120? Both?

I noticed it in 120.

> 
>> Nikon scan clips highlights, compresses tonal ranges.
>> See http://www.lwsphoto.com/scancompare.htm
> 
>> Lawrence W. Smith Photography
> 
> Ever try VueScan with it? That shoulda given you better tonal range to start
> with.

Ed had not released a version that worked with the 8000 when I had mine.
Some of the issues could have been improved by getting a good scanner
profile.


> 
> The banding looks like fatal flaw if that was a consistent prob,
> though...wonder if this is one of main reasons it's "not available" for the
> most
> part right now?


That is my guess.


Lawrence

----------------------------------
Lawrence W. Smith Photography
http://www.lwsphoto.com
lsmith@lwsphoto.com
----------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.