ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Output Size



On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 04:55:06 -0500  Martin Greene
(camerabuggy@earthlink.net) wrote:

>  Is it necessary to make scans at the
> output size and resolution one will ultimately be printing at, or can one
> make them any size and resolution and size them up in Photoshop ³Image
> Size²
> before printing?

Doing the latter is generally preferable IMO, tho' it depends on whether PS
interpolation routines are superior or worse than those in scanner s/w.
Remember the scanner has a fixed, native pixel pitch and density, so can
only vary it by dropping n scan lines or post-acquire processing.

Best to do your own tests and see which looks better, really.

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.