ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic (for Ed Hamrick)



A-ha.. Now this puts the question as to whether it really matters if one
uses a greyscale capture or makes one via Photoshop's desaturation or
conversion to greyscale then...

If Ed's method is a standard, then most scanners use averaging of the
RGB scan when they do a greyscale scan, which I suspect is also how
Photoshop creates a greyscale mode image from RGB.

Art

EdHamrick@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 2/1/2002 9:56:11 AM EST,
> alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com writes:
>
>
>>what channels do you get pixels from
>> when media type is set to BW negative?
>>
>
> All three, equally.
>
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.