ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: link to Minolta Multi Pro review



Both Ed Hamrick and Ken Rockwell say that there is very little noise, users
said the same, why do you worry? Sanning with ICE is always *much* slower
than without, and with the plug-in scan times seem more than reasonable.

I received some informations by Minolta about the Multi Pro today (well,
nothing but shining promises, but what did I expect!) and wait now for 2
persons that will scan me a 6x6 negative with the Polaroid 120 and the
Minolta Pro. If the Polaroid is not visibly better, I go for the Minolta,
its cheaper and has ICE.

Greetings Bernhard

----- Original Message -----
From: "DRP" <Didier.Roubinet@wanadoo.fr>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: filmscanners: link to Minolta Multi Pro review


> Hi all
>
> I found an user review for the new
> Minolta multi at : http://www.kenrockwell.com/minolta/mp.htm
>
> Remaining questions for me are CCD noise and scanning time with ICE
>
> Comments and adds welcome!
>
> Regards
>
> Didier
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.