|
Is it the 4000 or the 4000+ that's currently
available? I couldn't tell from a quick look at the Polaroid
website. I did notice that the rebates appear to have been extended until
January 31st -- a good thing, no doubt.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:52
PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid
SS4000 / 4000+ / 120 ???
David.
Yes, it is better but depending on your use and
requirements is it worth the
extra money? Silverfast has developed a
multi-scan function for the 4000+
that I am told works well. Have not seen
it myself.
I would imagine one could develop a test that showed the
differences but I
am not sure you would see that much difference on a
practical basis.
One thing I have found out is in the film scanner
community one mans
definition of great/wonderful can be less than
adequate for another man.
Frankly and at least based on US pricing it is
tough to beat the present
Sprintscan 4000
deal.
David
-----Original Message-----
From: David Gordon
[mailto:mail@davidgordon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:29
AM
To: Filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 / 4000+ / 120
???
This is really a question for David Hemingway but maybe others
have
experience...
How much better is the SS4000 + compared to the
'old' 4000? On paper it's
a better bit depth, am I correct? The Firewire
doesn't matter, are the
results noticeably better?
And, just for
35mm, will the SS120 produce a better scan than the SS4000
or the
4000+?
--
David Gordon
mail@davidgordon.co.uk
|
