ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000



>These problems seem to only apply to quite 'bent' film, eg 
>cardboard-mounted Kodachromes, which often have a variation of up to 
>about a millimetre from the centre to the edges. Are you lucky 
>enough (or young enough!) that all your  negatives/slides are flat 
>perhaps...?

Perhaps it's worth noting that Kodak now provides "curved field" 
projection lenses as standard for normal (cardboard, presumably) 
mounted slides in their Carousel projectors, but their older "flat 
field" design is recommended for glass mounted transparencies. The 
current plastic mounts allow the film to "float" in part to minimize 
popping, so there is less bowing. The differences are easy to see in 
projection, and also frustrating since my college's slide library 
intermixes all three types of mounts.
-- 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.