ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OptiCal correction/retraction



Thank you for the report, Bill.  Frankly, I very much questioned what you had 
said but had no solid information with which to dispute it.

I use PhotoCal myself (I'm an amateur) and I'm very satisfied with my Sony 
Trinitron (Dell-branded) monitor.

I have a Solux desklamp and I find it provides me with accurate renditions of 
my prints so as to compare them with the screen.

Maris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Fernandez" <bill_sub@billfernandez.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: filmscanners: OptiCal correction/retraction


| Hi gang--
| 
| I have to correct some erroneous information I contributed a couple 
| of weeks ago.
| 
| It turns out that OptiCal and the monitor Spyder can only be used as 
| a colorimeter (to measure color temperature and light intensity) of 
| your monitor, NOT your room lights.  ColorVision tech support says 
| they don't support the use of OptiCal/Spyder for room lights and I've 
| been getting wacky results in making the attempt so it looks like 
| they're right.
| 
| I also made a mistake in stating that if you use halogen viewing 
| lights you should adjust your monitor to the same color temperature 
| as those lights.  It turns out that to do this you'd have to turn 
| down the blue channel so much that you'd get dingy images and very 
| little tonal gradation (on your monitor) in the blues.
| 
| These misstatements came from misinterpreting some mentoring I'm 
| getting from an accomplished professional in this field.
| 
| What's still true is that if you want to be able to compare an image 
| on the screen to a physical print right next to it then the color 
| temperatures of the viewing light and the monitor must be the same, 
| and the brightness of the light reflected off a white paper in your 
| viewing area must be the same as the brightness of your monitor.
| 
| A new twist on this is that you can still do reasonably good 
| comparisons without having to match color temperature and brightness 
| if you do not have the print viewing area next to your monitor.  That 
| is, if the viewing area and the monitor are never both in your field 
| of view at the same time, and if the environment around your monitor 
| is dark enough not to affect you're eyes' interpretation of the 
| colors on the monitor, then you can look at the monitor, "memorize" 
| the color and tone of part of an image, then turn your back on the 
| monitor and examine a print in your viewing area.  Apparently it only 
| takes a few seconds for your eyes to adapt from one color temperature 
| to the other.
| 
| Hope this helps,
| 
| --bill
| 
| 
| 
| 
| >>"OptiCal lets you use the Spyder as a Colorimeter! You can use it 
| >>to measure the actual color temperature of your viewing lights be 
| >>they halogen incandescents, high CRI flourescents or whatever, then 
| >>it lets you set your monitor to THAT color temperature rather than 
| >>to one of the generic standards (5,000K or
| >>6,500K).  "
| -- 
| 
| ======================================================================
| Bill Fernandez  *  User Interface Architect  *  Bill Fernandez Design
| 
| (505) 346-3080  *  bill_sub@billfernandez.com  *  http://billfernandez.com
| ======================================================================
| 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.