ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI



Austin - is this true?  Can you show documentation to demonstrate? - bec if 
it is true then I am very surprised and have been very badly mislead.

Julian

At 10:42 30/10/01, Austin wrote:
>Note, when a digital camera claims 6M pixels...that's in fact a flat out
>lie.  It is REALLY 1.5M pixels, with four sensors per pixel...a pixel IS
>made up of all three RGB components, so it is really misleading to make the
>claims they do.  They would be more honest to call it a 6M SENSOR array.
>How they get 6M pixel OUTPUT is interpolation...which, of course, means that
>%75 of the image data is just made up, and not real image data (to a large
>degree).  And you thought the scanner dynamic range issue was misleading...




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.