Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 09:09:42 +1000
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJIEDKMNAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <3BDA9E1F.6010606@ampsc.com>

"Arthur Entlich" <artistic@ampsc.com> wrote:
> the only consumer "out of box" printers using pigmented inks that I'm
aware
> of are the Epson 2000P and the new C80.

There's another Epson; I think the C70.  It's basically the same as the C80
but
a little slower.  Uses the same carts.

Rob

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

References:
- RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
  - From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
  - From: Arthur Entlich <artistic@ampsc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: About 12 or 16 bits
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: Pixels per inch vs DPI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread